← All projects

04 / Enterprise knowledge and AI service

DEXIN AI

DEXIN AI enterprise assistant concept poster
Project concept poster · ImageGen

An assistant for enterprise knowledge and inquiries. This case focuses on permission-aware internal retrieval, cited answers, and human review.

GitHub · AI module documentation ↗
RoleProduct definition and knowledge architecture
PeriodSummer 2026
StatusRead-only retrieval implemented · validating

The Challenge

Enterprise knowledge was dispersed across documents and tacit experience, making consistent, bounded answers difficult.

Design blueprint / KNOWLEDGE

The anatomy of an answer

Governed sources, permissions, and evidence shape the answer.

Skip exhibit, read decisions ↓
The anatomy of an answerConcept model · not a simulation
01 / 06

Sources

Use governed sources with recorded versions and provenance.

ILLUSTRATIVE SCENARIOS

Three answer boundaries

Illustrative input: find a business process guide

Example: retrieve an accessible process document → return a summary with sources → invite review.

A CLOSER LOOK / DESIGN ANALYSIS

A citation is a starting point, not a verdict

These are proposed acceptance checks, not production evaluation results. Read-only access does not replace access control or human review.

Permission

Is restricted material excluded before context assembly, rather than merely hidden in the answer?

Support

Does the cited passage support the claim, with a compatible date and scope?

Gaps

Are missing or conflicting sources made explicit, with a next step for evidence or human review?

Public product reference ↗
Read the full reasoning · Chinese →

Approach

  1. Organized sources by business topic
  2. Designed boundaries for retrieval, response, and human review
  3. Prioritized verifiable, high-frequency use cases

System Structure

  1. Permissions: the signed-in user's database access scope
  2. Retrieval: intent classification, keyword/database filtering, and deterministic ranking
  3. Answers: bounded context, source labels, and recent conversation
  4. Boundary: no creating, approving, paying, or editing business records

Design Decisions

Read-only implementation · illustrative demonstration

Read-only first: permission and evidence precede the answer

Is a fluent answer enough to trigger a business action?

Separating inquiry from writes makes sourcing, permission, and human review inspectable. Restricted sources are not retrieved; missing evidence is stated explicitly. This exhibit explains the interaction without connecting company data or claiming verified operational reliability.

德小馨 AI · Public product scope ↗

Outcomes

  • Authenticated retrieval and answering endpoints implemented in the codebase
  • Source-labelled answers and persisted recent conversations
  • Business writes and autonomous execution remain outside the current scope
AI SystemsKnowledge BaseService Design

Discuss this project

Interested in this project’s methods, implementation, or tradeoffs? I welcome a conversation by email.

Discuss this project
Next projectBAWAN NELORA